Why Being Wrong on Purpose Gets Your Team Talking

Ask a room full of smart people what they think you should do and you'll get silence… post something obviously wrong and you can't get them to stop talking.

I've always called this the Stack Overflow effect — you post a question and wait days, you post a bad answer and someone corrects you inside the hour. Turns out it already has a name: Cunningham's Law. The best way to get the right answer isn't to ask the question, it's to put the wrong answer out there. And my hypothesis is that this isn't an internet thing at all… it's a people thing, and it shows up in your meetings every week. When you ask "what do you all think we should do," you're handing people a blank canvas and asking them to create on demand. That's genuinely hard. Put something specific and half-baked in front of them instead — a straw man, a rough draft, a framework with an obvious hole in it — and the opinions surface fast. It doesn't have to be *right*. It just has to be specific enough to react to.

There's a leadership principle sitting underneath the tactic, though. When something needs to move and nobody's engaging, going first *is* the job. You put something incomplete on the table not because you don't know better, but because you're giving people something real to push against… and that's what creates the conditions for the conversation to actually happen.

As I look at why most managers won't do this, it comes down to not wanting to look wrong in front of their team. So they wait for more certainty, a cleaner framework, a better answer… and nothing moves. The ones who can pull it off have made a different calculation: that being openly correctable isn't a credibility risk. When you put out something you don't fully know yet and let your team push on it, you're not exposing weakness… you're creating the conditions for them to build something better than what you walked in with.

0:00 Why pushing harder doesn't break the silence

0:11 The counterintuitive move: say something wrong

0:15 The Stack Overflow effect, and its real name

0:32 What Cunningham's Law actually states

0:40 Why the blank canvas problem shows up in your meetings

0:57 Straw men, rough drafts, and specific enough to react to

1:13 The leadership principle underneath the tactic

1:34 Why most managers wait instead — and nothing moves

1:48 Being openly correctable isn't a credibility risk

SUBSCRIBE for more insights on leadership, product, and technology

Newsletter: https://www.nathanbroslawsky.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/broslawsky

#leadership #management #cto #influence #collaboration #decisionmaking